Discussion:
[Openstack] [all] Bringing the community together (combine the lists!)
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-30 17:03:50 UTC
Permalink
The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and openstack-operators
mailing lists on lists.openstack.org see an increasing amount of
cross-posting and thread fragmentation as conversants attempt to
reach various corners of our community with topics of interest to
one or more (and sometimes all) of those overlapping groups of
subscribers. For some time we've been discussing and trying ways to
bring our developers, distributors, operators and end users together
into a less isolated, more cohesive community. An option which keeps
coming up is to combine these different but overlapping mailing
lists into one single discussion list. As we covered[1] in Vancouver
at the last Forum there are a lot of potential up-sides:

1. People with questions are no longer asking them in a different
place than many of the people who have the answers to those
questions (the "not for usage questions" in the openstack-dev ML
title only serves to drive the wedge between developers and users
deeper).

2. The openstack-sigs mailing list hasn't seem much uptake (an order
of magnitude fewer subscribers and posts) compared to the other
three lists, yet it was intended to bridge the communication gap
between them; combining those lists would have been a better
solution to the problem than adding yet another turned out to be.

3. At least one out of every ten messages to any of these lists is
cross-posted to one or more of the others, because we have topics
that span across these divided groups yet nobody is quite sure which
one is the best venue for them; combining would eliminate the
fragmented/duplicative/divergent discussion which results from
participants following up on the different subsets of lists to which
they're subscribed,

4. Half of the people who are actively posting to at least one of
the four lists subscribe to two or more, and a quarter to three if
not all four; they would no longer be receiving multiple copies of
the various cross-posts if these lists were combined.

The proposal is simple: create a new openstack-discuss mailing list
to cover all the above sorts of discussion and stop using the other
four. As the OpenStack ecosystem continues to mature and its
software and services stabilize, the nature of our discourse is
changing (becoming increasingly focused with fewer heated debates,
distilling to a more manageable volume), so this option is looking
much more attractive than in the past. That's not to say it's quiet
(we're looking at roughly 40 messages a day across them on average,
after deduplicating the cross-posts), but we've grown accustomed to
tagging the subjects of these messages to make it easier for other
participants to quickly filter topics which are relevant to them and
so would want a good set of guidelines on how to do so for the
combined list (a suggested set is already being brainstormed[2]).
None of this is set in stone of course, and I expect a lot of
continued discussion across these lists (oh, the irony) while we try
to settle on a plan, so definitely please follow up with your
questions, concerns, ideas, et cetera.

As an aside, some of you have probably also seen me talking about
experiments I've been doing with Mailman 3... I'm hoping new
features in its Hyperkitty and Postorius WebUIs make some of this
easier or more accessible to casual participants (particularly in
light of the combined list scenario), but none of the plan above
hinges on MM3 and should be entirely doable with the MM2 version
we're currently using.

Also, in case you were wondering, no the irony of cross-posting this
message to four mailing lists is not lost on me. ;)

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-devs-one-community
[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/common-openstack-ml-topics
--
Jeremy Stanley
Doug Hellmann
2018-08-30 17:17:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeremy Stanley
The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and openstack-operators
mailing lists on lists.openstack.org see an increasing amount of
cross-posting and thread fragmentation as conversants attempt to
reach various corners of our community with topics of interest to
one or more (and sometimes all) of those overlapping groups of
subscribers. For some time we've been discussing and trying ways to
bring our developers, distributors, operators and end users together
into a less isolated, more cohesive community. An option which keeps
coming up is to combine these different but overlapping mailing
lists into one single discussion list. As we covered[1] in Vancouver
1. People with questions are no longer asking them in a different
place than many of the people who have the answers to those
questions (the "not for usage questions" in the openstack-dev ML
title only serves to drive the wedge between developers and users
deeper).
2. The openstack-sigs mailing list hasn't seem much uptake (an order
of magnitude fewer subscribers and posts) compared to the other
three lists, yet it was intended to bridge the communication gap
between them; combining those lists would have been a better
solution to the problem than adding yet another turned out to be.
3. At least one out of every ten messages to any of these lists is
cross-posted to one or more of the others, because we have topics
that span across these divided groups yet nobody is quite sure which
one is the best venue for them; combining would eliminate the
fragmented/duplicative/divergent discussion which results from
participants following up on the different subsets of lists to which
they're subscribed,
4. Half of the people who are actively posting to at least one of
the four lists subscribe to two or more, and a quarter to three if
not all four; they would no longer be receiving multiple copies of
the various cross-posts if these lists were combined.
The proposal is simple: create a new openstack-discuss mailing list
to cover all the above sorts of discussion and stop using the other
four. As the OpenStack ecosystem continues to mature and its
software and services stabilize, the nature of our discourse is
changing (becoming increasingly focused with fewer heated debates,
distilling to a more manageable volume), so this option is looking
much more attractive than in the past. That's not to say it's quiet
(we're looking at roughly 40 messages a day across them on average,
after deduplicating the cross-posts), but we've grown accustomed to
tagging the subjects of these messages to make it easier for other
participants to quickly filter topics which are relevant to them and
so would want a good set of guidelines on how to do so for the
combined list (a suggested set is already being brainstormed[2]).
None of this is set in stone of course, and I expect a lot of
continued discussion across these lists (oh, the irony) while we try
to settle on a plan, so definitely please follow up with your
questions, concerns, ideas, et cetera.
As an aside, some of you have probably also seen me talking about
experiments I've been doing with Mailman 3... I'm hoping new
features in its Hyperkitty and Postorius WebUIs make some of this
easier or more accessible to casual participants (particularly in
light of the combined list scenario), but none of the plan above
hinges on MM3 and should be entirely doable with the MM2 version
we're currently using.
Also, in case you were wondering, no the irony of cross-posting this
message to four mailing lists is not lost on me. ;)
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-devs-one-community
[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/common-openstack-ml-topics
I fully support the idea of merging the lists.

Doug

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : ***@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org
Chris Friesen
2018-08-30 18:57:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeremy Stanley
The proposal is simple: create a new openstack-discuss mailing list
to cover all the above sorts of discussion and stop using the other
four.
Do we want to merge usage and development onto one list? That could be a busy
list for someone who's just asking a simple usage question.

Alternately, if we are going to merge everything then why not just use the
"openstack" mailing list since it already exists and there are references to it
on the web.

(Or do you want to force people to move to something new to make them recognize
that something has changed?)

Chris

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : ***@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-30 21:25:37 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-08-30 12:57:31 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote:
[...]
Do we want to merge usage and development onto one list? That
could be a busy list for someone who's just asking a simple usage
question.
A counterargument though... projecting the number of unique posts to
all four lists combined for this year (both based on trending for
the past several years and also simply scaling the count of messages
this year so far based on how many days are left) comes out roughly
equal to the number of posts which were made to the general
openstack mailing list in 2012.
Alternately, if we are going to merge everything then why not just
use the "openstack" mailing list since it already exists and there
are references to it on the web.
This was an option we discussed in the "One Community" forum session
as well. There seemed to be a slight preference for making a new
-disscuss list and retiring the old general one. I see either as an
potential solution here.
(Or do you want to force people to move to something new to make them
recognize that something has changed?)
That was one of the arguments made. Also I believe we have a *lot*
of "black hole" subscribers who aren't actually following that list
but whose addresses aren't bouncing new posts we send them for any
of a number of possible reasons.
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-30 21:33:41 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-08-30 22:49:26 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
I really don't want this. I'm happy with things being sorted in
multiple lists, even though I'm subscribed to multiples.
I understand where you're coming from, and I used to feel similarly.
I was accustomed to communities where developers had one mailing
list, users had another, and whenever a user asked a question on the
developer mailing list they were told to go away and bother the user
mailing list instead (not even a good, old-fashioned "RTFM" for
their trouble). You're probably intimately familiar with at least
one of these communities. ;)

As the years went by, it's become apparent to me that this is
actually an antisocial behavior pattern, and actively harmful to the
user base. I believe OpenStack actually wants users to see the
development work which is underway, come to understand it, and
become part of that process. Requiring them to have their
conversations elsewhere sends the opposite message.
--
Jeremy Stanley
Melvin Hillsman
2018-08-30 23:08:56 UTC
Permalink
I think the more we can reduce the ML sprawl the better. I also recall us
discussing having some documentation or way of notifying net new signups of
how to interact with the ML successfully. An example was having some
general guidelines around tagging. Also as a maintainer for at least one of
the mailing lists over the past 6+ months I have to inquire about how that
will happen going forward which again could be part of this
documentation/initial message.

Also there are many times I miss messages that for one reason or another do
not hit the proper mailing list. I mean we could dive into the minutia or
start up the mountain of why keeping things the way they are is worst than
making this change and vice versa but I am willing to bet there are more
advantages than disadvantages.
[...]
I really don't want this. I'm happy with things being sorted in
multiple lists, even though I'm subscribed to multiples.
IMO this is easily solved by tagging. If emails are properly tagged
(which they typically are), most email clients will properly sort on rules
and you can just auto-delete if you're 100% not interested in a particular
topic.
Yes, there are definitely ways to go about discarding unwanted mail
automagically or not seeing it at all. And to be honest I think if we are
relying on so many separate MLs to do that for us it is better community
wide for the responsibility for that to be on individuals. It becomes very
tiring and inefficient time wise to have to go through the various issues
of the way things are now; cross-posting is a great example that is
steadily getting worse.
SNIP
As the years went by, it's become apparent to me that this is
actually an antisocial behavior pattern, and actively harmful to the
user base. I believe OpenStack actually wants users to see the
development work which is underway, come to understand it, and
become part of that process. Requiring them to have their
conversations elsewhere sends the opposite message.
I really and truly believe that it has become a blocker for our
community. Conversations sent to multiple lists inherently splinter and we
end up with different groups coming up with different solutions for a
single problem. Literally the opposite desired result of sending things to
multiple lists. I believe bringing these groups together, with tags, will
solve a lot of immediate problems. It will also have an added bonus of
allowing people "catching up" on the community to look to a single place
for a thread i/o 1-5 separate lists. It's better in both the short and
long term.
+1
Cheers,
Jimmy
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
--
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
***@gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-31 00:21:22 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-08-30 18:08:56 -0500 (-0500), Melvin Hillsman wrote:
[...]
I also recall us discussing having some documentation or way of
notifying net new signups of how to interact with the ML
successfully. An example was having some general guidelines around
tagging. Also as a maintainer for at least one of the mailing
lists over the past 6+ months I have to inquire about how that
will happen going forward which again could be part of this
documentation/initial message.
[...]

Mailman supports customizable welcome messages for new subscribers,
so the *technical* implementation there is easy. I do think (and
failed to highlight it explicitly earlier I'm afraid) that this
proposal comes with an expectation that we provide recommended
guidelines for mailing list use/etiquette appropriate to our
community. It could be contained entirely within the welcome
message, or merely linked to a published document (and whether
that's best suited for the Infra Manual or New Contributor Guide or
somewhere else entirely is certainly up for debate), or even
potentially both.
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-31 16:45:24 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-08-31 14:02:23 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
I'm coming from the time when OpenStack had a list on launchpad
where everything was mixed. We did the split because it was really
annoying to have everything mixed.
[...]

These days (just running stats for this calendar year) we've been
averaging 4 messages a day on the general ***@lists.o.o ML, so
if it's volume you're worried about most of it would be the current
-operators and -dev ML discussions anyway (many of which are general
questions from users already, because as you also pointed out we
don't usually tell them to take their questions elsewhere any more).
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-30 21:12:57 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-08-31 01:13:58 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote:
[...]
What needs to be done for this is full topic categories support
under `options` page so people get to filter emails properly.
[...]

Unfortunately, topic filtering is one of the MM2 features the
Mailman community decided nobody used (or at least not enough to
warrant preserving it in MM3). I do think we need to be consistent
about tagging subjects to make client-side filtering more effective
for people who want that, but if we _do_ want to be able to upgrade
we shouldn't continue to rely on server-side filtering support in
Mailman unless we can somehow work with them to help in
reimplementing it.
--
Jeremy Stanley
Tony Breeds
2018-08-31 00:03:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeremy Stanley
[...]
What needs to be done for this is full topic categories support
under `options` page so people get to filter emails properly.
[...]
Unfortunately, topic filtering is one of the MM2 features the
Mailman community decided nobody used (or at least not enough to
warrant preserving it in MM3). I do think we need to be consistent
about tagging subjects to make client-side filtering more effective
for people who want that, but if we _do_ want to be able to upgrade
we shouldn't continue to rely on server-side filtering support in
Mailman unless we can somehow work with them to help in
reimplementing it.
The suggestion is to implement it as a 3rd party plugin or work with the
mm community to implement:
https://wiki.mailman.psf.io/DEV/Dynamic%20Sublists

So if we decide we really want that in mm3 we have options.

Yours Tony.
Jeremy Stanley
2018-08-31 16:17:26 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-08-31 09:35:55 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote:
[...]
I've tinked with mailman 3 before so I could probably take a shot at
this over the next few week(end)s; however, I've no idea how this
feature is supposed to work. Any chance an admin of the current list
could send me a couple of screenshots of the feature in mailman 2 along
with a brief description of the feature? Alternatively, maybe we could
upload them to the wiki page Tony linked above or, better yet, to the
https://wiki.mailman.psf.io/DEV/Brief%20Technical%20Details
Looks like this should be
https://wiki.list.org/DEV/Brief%20Technical%20Details instead,
however reading through it doesn't really sound like the topic
filtering feature from MM2.

The List Member Manual has a very brief description of the feature
from the subscriber standpoint:

http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node29.html

The List Administration Manual unfortunately doesn't have any
content for the feature, just a stubbed-out section heading:

http://www.list.org/mailman-admin/node30.html

Sending screenshots to the ML is a bit tough, but luckily MIT's
listadmins have posted some so we don't need to:

http://web.mit.edu/lists/mailman/topics.html
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-09-20 16:32:49 UTC
Permalink
tl;dr: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and
openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this is being sent) will
be replaced by a new openstack-***@lists.openstack.org mailing
list. The new list is open for subscriptions[0] now, but is not yet
accepting posts until Monday November 19 and it's strongly
recommended to subscribe before that date so as not to miss any
messages posted there. The old lists will be configured to no longer
accept posts starting on Monday December 3, but in the interim posts
to the old lists will also get copied to the new list so it's safe
to unsubscribe from them any time after the 19th and not miss any
messages. Now on to the details...

The original proposal[1] I cross-posted to these lists in August
received overwhelmingly positive feedback (indeed only one strong
objection[2] was posted, thanks Thomas for speaking up, and my
apologies in advance if this makes things less convenient for you),
which is unusual since our community usually tends to operate on
silent assent and tacit agreement. Seeing what we can only interpret
as majority consensus for the plan among the people reading messages
posted to these lists, a group of interested individuals met last
week in the Infrastructure team room at the PTG to work out the
finer details[3]. We devised a phased timeline:

During the first phase (which begins with this announcement) the new
openstack-discuss mailing list will accept subscriptions but not
posts. Its short and full descriptions indicate this, as does the
welcome message sent to all new subscribers during this phase. The
list is configured for "emergency moderation" mode so that all
posts, even those from subscribers, immediately land in the
moderation queue and can be rejected with an appropriate message. We
strongly recommend everyone who is on any of the current general
openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-operators and openstack-sigs
lists subscribe to openstack-discuss during this phase in order to
avoid missing any messages to the new list. Phase one lasts roughly
one month and ends on Monday November 19, just after the OpenStack
Stein Summit in Berlin.

The second phase picks up at the end of the first. During this
phase, emergency moderation is no longer in effect and subscribers
can post to the list normally (non-subscribers are subject to
moderation of course in order to limit spam). Any owners/moderators
from the original lists who wish it will be added to the new one to
collaborate on moderation tasks. At this time the openstack-discuss
list address itself will be subscribed to posts from the openstack,
openstack-dev, openstack-operators and openstack-sigs mailing lists
so anyone who wishes to unsubscribe from those can do so at any time
during this phase without missing any replies sent there. The list
descriptions and welcome message will also be updated to their
production prose. Phase two runs for two weeks ending on Monday
December 3.

The third and final phase begins at the end of the second, when
further posts to the general openstack, openstack-dev,
openstack-operators and openstack-sigs lists will be refused and the
descriptions for those lists updated to indicate they're
indefinitely retired from use. The old archives will still be
preserved of course, but no new content will appear in them.

A note about DMARC/DKIM: during the planning discussion we also
spoke briefly about the problems we encounter on the current lists
whereby subscriber MTAs which check DKIM signatures appearing in
some posts reject them and cause those subscribers to get
unsubscribed after too many of these bounces. While reviewing the
various possible mitigation options available to us, we eventually
resolved that the least objectionable solution was to cease
modifying the list subject and body. As such, for the new
openstack-discuss list you won't see [openstack-discuss] prepended
to message subjects, and there will be no list footer block added to
the message body. Rest assured the usual RFC 2369 List-* headers[4]
will still be added so MUAs can continue to take filtering actions
based on them as on our other lists.

I'm also including a couple of FAQs which have come up over the
course of this...

Why make a new list instead of just directing people to join an
existing one such as the openstack general ML? For one, the above
list behavior change to address DMARC/DKIM issues is a good reason
to want a new list; making those changes to any of the existing
lists is already likely to be disruptive anyway as subscribers may
be relying on the subject mangling for purposes of filtering list
traffic. Also as noted earlier in the thread for the original
proposal, we have many suspected defunct subscribers who are not
bouncing (either due to abandoned mailboxes or MTAs black-holing
them) so this is a good opportunity to clean up the subscriber list
and reduce the overall amount of E-mail unnecessarily sent by the
server.

Why not simply auto-subscribe everyone from the four older lists to
the new one and call it a day? Well, I personally would find it rude
if a list admin mass-subscribed me to a mailing list I hadn't
directly requested. Doing so may even be illegal in some
jurisdictions (we could probably make a case that it's warranted,
but it's cleaner to not need to justify such an action). Much like
the answer to the previous question, the changes in behavior (and
also in the list name itself) are likely to cause lots of
subscribers to need to update their message filtering rules anyway.
I know by default it would all start landing in my main inbox, and
annoy me mightily.

What subject tags are we going to be using to identify messages of
interest and to be able to skip those we don't care about? We're
going to continuously deploy a list of recommended subject tags in a
visible space, either on the listserv's WebUI or the Infra Manual
and link to it liberally. There is already an initial set of
suggestions[5] being brainstormed, so feel free to add any there you
feel might be missing. It's not yet been decided whether we'll also
include these in the Mailman "Topics" configuration to enable
server-side filtering on them (as there's a good chance we'll be
unable to continue supporting that after an upgrade to Mailman 3),
so for now it's best to assume you may need to add them to your
client-side filters if you rely on that capability.

If you have any further questions, please feel free to respond to
this announcement so we can make sure they're answered.

[0] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2018-August/000493.html
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-August/134074.html
[3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-ptg-denver-2018
[4] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2369.txt
[5] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/common-openstack-ml-topics
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-10-29 16:53:47 UTC
Permalink
REMINDER: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and
openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this is being sent) will
be replaced by a new openstack-***@lists.openstack.org mailing
list. The new list is open for subscriptions[0] now, but is not yet
accepting posts until Monday November 19 and it's strongly
recommended to subscribe before that date so as not to miss any
messages posted there. The old lists will be configured to no longer
accept posts starting on Monday December 3, but in the interim posts
to the old lists will also get copied to the new list so it's safe
to unsubscribe from them any time after the 19th and not miss any
messages. See my previous notice[1] for details.

For those wondering, we have 127 subscribers so far on
openstack-discuss with 3 weeks to go before it will be put into use
(and 5 weeks now before the old lists are closed down for good).

[0] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134911.html
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-11-09 18:14:47 UTC
Permalink
REMINDER: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and
openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this is being sent) will
be replaced by a new openstack-***@lists.openstack.org mailing
list. The new list is open for subscriptions[0] now, but is not yet
accepting posts until Monday November 19 and it's strongly
recommended to subscribe before that date so as not to miss any
messages posted there. The old lists will be configured to no longer
accept posts starting on Monday December 3, but in the interim posts
to the old lists will also get copied to the new list so it's safe
to unsubscribe from them any time after the 19th and not miss any
messages. See my previous notice[1] for details.

For those wondering, we have 207 subscribers so far on
openstack-discuss with a little over a week to go before it will be
put into use (and less than a month before the old lists are closed
down for good).

[0] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134911.html
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-11-10 15:53:22 UTC
Permalink
On 2018-11-10 11:02:15 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
As we are ultimately planning to move lists to mailman3 (which decided
to drop the "topics" concept altogether), I don't think we planned to
add serverside mailman topics to the new list.
Correct, that was covered in more detail in the longer original
announcement linked from my past couple of reminders:

http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134911.html

In short, we're recommending client-side filtering because
server-side topic selection/management was not retained in Mailman 3
as Thierry indicates and we hope we might move our lists to an MM3
instance sometime in the not-too-distant future.
We'll still have standardized subject line topics. The current list
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/common-openstack-ml-topics
Which is its initial location for crowd-sourcing/brainstorming, but
will get published to a more durable location like on
lists.openstack.org itself or perhaps the Project-Team Guide once
the list is in use.
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-11-19 00:03:43 UTC
Permalink
REMINDER: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and
openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this was sent) are being
replaced by a new openstack-***@lists.openstack.org mailing
list. The new list[0] is open for posts from subscribers starting
now, and the old lists will be configured to no longer accept posts
starting on Monday December 3. In the interim, posts to the old
lists will also get copied to the new list so it's safe to
unsubscribe from them now and not miss any messages. See my previous
notice[1] for details.

As of the time of this announcement, we have 280 subscribers on
openstack-discuss with three weeks to go before the old lists are
closed down for good). At the recommendation of David Medberry at
the OpenStack Summit last week, this reminder is being sent
individually to each of the old lists (not as a cross-post), and
without any topic tag in case either might be resulting in
subscribers missing it.

[0] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134911.html
--
Jeremy Stanley
Jeremy Stanley
2018-11-27 18:22:30 UTC
Permalink
REMINDER: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and
openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this was sent) are being
replaced by a new openstack-***@lists.openstack.org mailing
list. The new list[0] has been open for posts from subscribers since
Monday November 19, and the old lists will be configured to no
longer accept posts starting on Monday December 3. In the interim,
posts to the old lists will also get copied to the new list so it's
safe to unsubscribe from them now and not miss any messages. See my
previous notice[1] for details.

As of the time of this announcement, we have 403 subscribers on
openstack-discuss with six days to go before the old lists are
closed down for good). I have updated the old list descriptions to
indicate the openstack-discuss list is preferred, and added a custom
"welcome message" with the same for anyone who subscribes to them
over the next week.

[0] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134911.html
--
Jeremy Stanley
Melvin Hillsman
2018-10-29 17:08:54 UTC
Permalink
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Samuel Cassiba <***@cassi.ba>
Date: Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [all][tc] We're combining the
lists! (was: Bringing the community together...)
Post by Jeremy Stanley
tl;dr: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and
openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this is being sent) will
list.
Since last week there was some discussion of including the openstack-tc
mailing list among these lists to eliminate confusion caused by the fact
that the list is not configured to accept messages from all subscribers
(it's meant to be used for us to make sure TC members see meeting
announcements).
I'm inclined to include it and either use a direct mailing or the
[tc] tag on the new discuss list to reach TC members, but I would
like to hear feedback from TC members and other interested parties
before calling that decision made. Please let me know what you think.
Doug
+1 including the TC list as a tag makes sense to me and my tangent
about intent in online communities.

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-***@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
***@gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...